Archive for the ‘Violence’ Category

Is Sharia law cruel?

Saturday, June 4th, 2011

I am a peace-loving person by nature. I simply hate, hate, HATE violence. I can’t stand it. I can’t watch gory things. I know Islam is peaceful. But people have told me that I’m so brainwashed that I can’t understand that Shariah Law is really not the right thing. Please note that I’m not saying Shariah Law isn’t the right thing, I’m just confused at what my feelings are.

I’ll get down to the questions. Please understand however, that these questions are of curious nature, and not to offend people or try to refute Islam. I’m simply keeping an open mind when asking so I can answer others and so I can be contented; I’m asking it the way others have asked so blatantly, so it’s more relatable. Forgive me Allah, if I have transgressed.

Bless your heart, sister. There is no sin in asking. When God Almighty told the angels that He was about to create Adam, they asked why! They said,
“Will you put in it (the earth) whom will corrupt in it and shed blood?” (2:30)

God did not chastise them. He simply told them that He knows what they do not.

Dr. Jeffrey Lang put it well in the title of one of his excellent books, “Even Angels Ask.”

1) Why does Shariah Law have to be torture before death?/Painful death?/Death in a very painful way?

The only penalty that involves pain before death is crucifixion for Hiraaba (terrorism), as stated in 5:33. Terrorists do not deserve any mercy. The pain they cause their innocent victims deserves to be returned likewise. You do not have to watch the crucifixion of terrorists, but only to know that they have been justly punished.

2)Why does Islam practice an ‘eye-for-an-eye’ in these matters? Isn’t that a vengeful way out? Forgiveness in Islam was also heavily emphasized. I would think that a hurt family member would have wanted the killer killed.

Family members of a murder victim are offered three choices: (a) kill the convicted murderer, (b) take a ransom, or (c) pardon the murderer. That is Sharia law. The choice is not the judge’s or the jury’s, it’s the murder victim’s family’s. This makes provision for families who are unable to forgive. It also makes provision for families who will benefit more from punitive damages. It also does not leave out the pardon option you are looking for.

3)I’ve heard the church burnings of before were done to save the burning person from the even more dangerous “fires of Hell.” And then they say Islam wants the accused to be saved from an even greater danger (Hell), which is why the rapist for example, has to be set to death.

Nonsense. Rape is terrorism and adultery combined. The punishment for terrorism is one of four, as clearly stated in the Hiraaba verse, (5:33): (a) Killing, (b) crucifixion, (c) severing a hand and a foot on opposite sides, or (d) permanent deportation. The choice is left to the judge and is based on the severity of the crime. If the punishment for a rapist was death, that does not mean he is saved from Hell. That is God’s decision to make.

4)Why are apostates killed? Freedom of religion is emphasized in Islam, so why is there an apostasy rule? There are answers in my head, but I still can’t comprehend it.

They are not. This is one of the misconceptions about Sharia. There is no punishment for apostasy. See the posts in the Apostasy category for details. You are right; freedom of religion is guaranteed in Islam and mandated by God in the Quran.

5)Islam cannot change its rules. I accept Shariah Law, I guess, but it’s easier said than done. If I saw it with my own eyes, being carried out, I’m very scared of what will happen to my faith. Any way of understanding the wisdom behind Shariah Law?

Don’t see it. Most people are like you. The few penalties in Sharia that are tough are tough for the reasons I mentioned above. The punishment must suit the crime and there must be a visual deterrent to potential criminals who do witness a penalty carried out.

6)What does “stoning” mean?

It means throwing stones at someone until he or she dies. It is a Jewish custom that crept into Muslim society and it has no basis in Islam. It is another misconception about Sharia. Read this post for details, also check out the Misconceptions and Islamophobia categories, where many of your concerns are discussed and clarified. There is a lot of misunderstanding, even among Muslims, of what Sharia includes and doesn’t include.

7)Why doesn’t Islam offer rehabilitation for homosexuals? I’m not making my own rules, btw. Why is it stoning instead? What is the validity of this:

“Maududi vol. 2, p. 52, note 68):

. . . Ibn Abbas ruled that they be thrown headlong from the highest summit.”

The punishment in Islam for male homosexuality is discipline, not death, as clearly stated in 4:16. Any fatwa saying otherwise is in contradiction to the Quran, and therefore must not be considered. In fact, rehabilitation for homosexuals is precisely what the Quran encourages. In 4:15, God says that female homosexuals are to live under house arrest “until God makes for them a way out” (4:15). The house arrest gives rehab a chance. It also saves the women’s dignity and privacy and saves their families honor. Many exegetes have interpreted the “way out” as proper marriage. As for male homosexuals, 4:16 clearly states that if the two men repent and reform, then Muslims must not bother them anymore. That’s rehab, isn’t it? And it’s a far cry from killing them, wouldn’t you say?

Please understand that it is not my intention to mislead or offend, nau’uzubillah (seeking refuge in God from such). I myself have no proper knowledge on this matter. I believe in Islam; it has far too clear a message to ignore. I am trying to learn, since a lot of websites do not explain this matter satisfactorily to me. They don’t give proper reasons, therefore this doubt lingers on. May Allah Forgive me if I’ve said anything wrong.

Don’t stay in doubt and don’t settle for bad or half answers. I hope that you read my humble answer and that it is clear enough for you. Islam and its Sharia are innocent from the lousy interpretations Muslims and others have made of it.

A halal armed robbery?

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011

This is funny if it wasn’t so pathetic. An armed robber testifies that his crime was halal (allowed in Islam) because he needed the money! He needed the money because he was a member of a terrorist group, so he couldn’t get a job! Here is a link to the news article,

This also shows you the twisted mentality of terrorists. First, they assert that what they are trying to do is good, and of course it’s evil, then they assert that the end justifies the means, and of course it doesn’t, and use that to justify everything they do on that basis.

The punishment specified in the Quran for terrorism (ترويع الآمنين), which includes armed robbery, is frightening: Execution, crucifixion, severing a hand and a leg on opposite sides or life in prison. (5:33) Islamic jurists have said that the choice of which punishment applies is left to the judge and is based on the extent of the harm done.

Misinterpreting Quranic verses

Monday, January 24th, 2011

I thought you’d like this article, which talks about misinterpretation of some Quranic verses, that lead to the conclusion that they condone violence. They do not at all. People should know that and not accuse the Quran of what it does not say.

Thanks for sharing this good article. Indeed, many verses of the Quran were misunderstood and misinterpreted even by some Muslim scholars, so it’s no wonder that orientalists of the past and Islamophobes of the present have claimed that Islam is violent or aggressive; many Muslim scholars made it look that way!

One glaring case in point is what the classic scholars wrote about the so-called “sword” verse.

Are Muslims obligated to fight non-Muslims till they accept Islam?

Monday, February 15th, 2010

I’ve read articles on the web alleging that the Quran requires Muslims to fight non-Muslims until they accept Islam or be killed! The article quotes verse 8:39. I find that hard to believe, but then I’m no expert on the Quran.

Your instinct is correct. The Quran says no such thing.

The verse the article quotes in evidence comes between two verses. Here are the three verses, which together make the meaning very clear,

{8:38} Say to those who have disbelieved [that] if they cease, they will be forgiven what has previously occurred. But if they return [to hostility] – then the precedent of the former [rebellious] peoples has passed.
{8:39} And fight them until there is no persecution and [until] the religion, all of it, is for God. And if they cease – then indeed, God sees well what they do.
{8:40} But if they turn away – then know that God is your protector. How excellent a protector, and how excellent a helper!

Thus, the subject of this verse is fighting religious persecution so that people who choose Islam will not be persecuted. But even if religious persecution continues, Muslims must endure knowing that God is with them and will protect their faith.

That same clear principle is stated in Chapter 2 as well,
{2:193} Fight them until there is no persecution and the religion is for God. If they cease, then there is to be no aggression except against the oppressors.

The Quran has repeatedly made it clear that faith is voluntary. Some verses that teach that unambiguously are,

{18:29} And say, “The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills – let him believe; and whoever wills – let him disbelieve.
{10:99} And had your Lord willed [it], those in the earth would have believed – all of them entirely. Is it you then who compels people to be believers?

Where does the Quran condone terrorism?

Wednesday, April 4th, 2007

Can someone please give me the full Quran quotes for those verses in the Quran that encourage terrorism and let me know the meaning of them all without quoting them out of context? Thanks.

That’s easy. The answer is “Verse not Found!”

Suicide is forbidden by God. He said “Do not kill yourselves. God is merciful to you.” (4:29)

Killing is forbidden by God. He said “and whoever kills a soul not in retaliation for the killing of another soul nor because of corruption in the land, it is as if he killed all mankind. And he who saves a soul, it is as if he saved all mankind.” (5:32). The decision of whether there’s corruption in the land that warrants a capital punishment can only be delivered by a duly elected scholarly imam (head of state) or a duly appointed scholarly judge and after consultation. Not every Tom, Dick and Harry can give a religious edict.

Quite the contrary, the Quran specifies the capital punishment for the crime of terrorism! Islamic scholars have all agreed that terrorism, called in the Sharee`a (Islamic law) “terrifying the secure”, is one of the acts the Quran describes in 5:33 as “fighting God and His Messenger.”